Believe it or not, I don’t know everything. No,
wait. Strike that. Believe it or not, I don’t actually believe I know everything. You might think I think I know
everything, what with all the opinionated blogging and all. But, really, I
don’t. Think that, I mean.
So when I wrote recently about White
people using the n-word (and yes, that’s how I’m going to refer to it;
sorry), and then wrote
about some of the reactions I got to that post, I wasn’t suggesting that I
know everything there is to know about the topic. Because I most certainly
don’t.
In fact, there are quite a few people who
understand the issue in ways I can’t. Like, for example, Shayla Pierce (@ShaylaDPierce on Twitter) who writes
at XO Jane. She
explains, in ways I never could, why it is not, and likely never will be,
okay for White folks to bandy that word about:
But would it really be horror,
Shayla? It’s 2013 in allegedly post racial America. Your president is
Black for crying out loud. Wouldn’t that word just roll right off your
back?
Quite the contrary. All that
is precisely the reason why it doesn’t. A complete stranger has the
ability to come along and remind you that, still, after all this time and all
the progress you think you’ve made, people still hate you just because your
skin is brown. And in an instance, with little more effort than it takes to
breathe, can reduce you to absolutely nothing.
Read the whole piece. It’s brilliant, but more than
that: It comes from someone who knows. And because she knows, people ought to
listen.
That’s right, my fellow White folks. We could stand
to do more listening than talking on this particular subject.
In any event, Pierce’s description of having been
victimized by the n-word at age 9 struck me on a visceral level. My daughter is
11 – not far removed from the age Pierce was when that occurred – and if anyone
ever hurt my daughter like that, let me tell you: Their dental records had
better be up to date. You know. For purposes of identifying the body.
But, of course, no one ever could hurt my daughter precisely
like that. There are all sorts of mean, awful, horrible,
vicious things somebody could say to her – things that would, I assure you,
cause me to visit that same swift and terrible retribution upon the offender
mentioned above, like the hand of freaking God – but nothing precisely like calling a 9 year old
Black girl the n-word. Is it the worst thing anyone could ever say to a young
person? I don’t know, because I can’t know.
That’s called privilege. White people like me, my
wife, my kids … we can’t know what it’s like to be victimized by those kinds of
racial slurs; all we can do is listen to those who actually do know it, and try to understand, however imperfectly. Because it’s
important to try to understand what other people have gone through, especially
when the effort to understand means you come to grips with your own privilege.
Which leads me to ask this question. I understand
the counterargument that some people make; the argument that by using the
n-word – or, for that matter, any other slur, racial, ethnic, religious,
gender-based, whatever – you deprive that word of its hurtful meaning. Recall
that famous scene from Lenny where Dustin Hoffman, playing the title character,
says if we used that word regularly, then maybe, eventually, nobody’d be able
to use it to hurt a Black child ever again.
So, yeah, I get the point. But I have to ask: Do
you really want to change the
meaning of that word? Do you really want to take the hurt out of it?
No, I’m not asking if you really want to stop
hurting people by using racial slurs. Of course you do. But there’s a very easy
way to stop hurting people by using racial slurs: Stop using them. Which was the point of my original piece.
My point here is this: The hurtful nature of that
word has actual, historical significance. It is, in a sense, an historical
document in its own right.
Racial slurs, racist language and imagery, and especially the n-word itself, were part-and-parcel of our
history of racial oppression. Language was one of the chief weapons in the
racist’s arsenal, a tool used to dehumanize African Americans and make
institutionalized racism, from slavery to segregation, possible. Because you can’t do that to other human beings
unless you see them as less than human.
Let’s imagine Lenny Bruce was right and by
repeating the word over and over and over again, it loses all of its power.
It’s no longer a hurtful word. Then how do you teach that aspect of our
history? How do future generations come to understand what that word meant, in
its historical context? They wouldn’t be able to grasp the meaning of that word
as it was used by Twain and Faulkner, let alone how it was used in the days of
Jim Crow.
It’s a word that’s ineluctably tied to our history. I don’t believe you can understand the
history of America in its entirety without understanding the power of that
word.
So, I’m sorry, White people, but I think we’re
stuck with it. And with all its mean, awful, horrible, vicious power. We own
the hurt it’s caused over the years. We can’t wish away that part of our
history.
But fer Chrissakes, please stop saying it.

I have a friend I discuss this with often - erasing history, that is. It's convenient to delicate modern sensibilities to pretend that things were never bad or objectionable in the past, but means that we can't ever see how we've progressed, and how much further we have to go.
ReplyDeleteNote - this friend and I often discuss it in the context of older fiction - how people want to either ignore it, say they can't read it because it's "full of fail" or would prefer to see modern updates of it.
Those who ignore....etc.
History, despite its wrenching pain
DeleteCannot be unlived, and if faced
With courage, need not be lived again
– Maya Angelou, “Inaugural Poem” (1993) http://poetry.eserver.org/angelou.html
LOVE this. Truth = beauty.
DeleteThe first line of my twitter profile is "Smart people know what they don't know." You've proved once again, Dave, that you are brilliant with this posting.
ReplyDeleteI got into it a few years back with a now banned idiot on DailyKos who claimed he understood what it meant to deal with racism because his grandparents told him about the stigma they incurred from the "Irish need not apply" practice in the 19th & early 20th Centuries. Now being identifiably Irish (my twitter handle is a only slight deviation of my real name) as well as a heavily freckled, green eyed, redhead, I had the duty to give this guy a cyber whacking based on this very same concept.
Those of us who are non-Hispanic Caucasians cannot ever know what it is like to walk out the door, knowing that it is guaranteed we will encounter people who are hateful, fearful and suspicious of us because of the color of our complexion. Anyone who claims they do understand is lying and unwilling to face their own cultural biases.
My step uncle is 1/2 Puerto Rican and 1/2 Jamaican. He served honorably during Vietnam and came home with very evident symptoms of PTSD. But he will tell you, the scars from his PTSD pale in comparison to the scars he's dealt with his whole life from racists, closeted or otherwise.
@ferallike
Thank you. I really appreciate the kind words, and I wholeheartedly agree.
DeleteI mostly agree with your original post about white people using the n word. But I would suggest one more circumstance where it might be appropriate.
ReplyDeleteI have never called anyone by that epithet, nor ever used it in the presence of a black person, for that matter. But sometimes in the company of conservative whites I get pretty sick and tired of the genteel code words and dog whistles. So I might just look them in the eye and say something like, "Oh yeah, gotta keep those n****rs in their place, right?" This is usually followed by much defensive backpedaling.
Sometimes you've got to rub their noses in it.